Welcome to the Escape Velocity Collection!
We are an opinionated group of friends reviewing all sorts of fantasy and science fiction media. Don’t forget to get to know the curators and visit our curated Collection, where we discuss the stories that never cease to transport us to another world.
Will you escape with us?
LATEST POSTS:
- Movie directed by Ridley Scott
- Starring Matt Damon
- Released September 2015
- Runtime: 141 minutes
NASA Astronaut Mark Watney was only supposed to be on Mars for 31 days. When a Dust storm almost kills him, the rest of the crew leaves – under the impression that their colleague is actually dead. In his logs, Watney keeps track of his days (or “sols” – Mars days) on the Red planet, and his efforts to survive on the supplies and equipment left behind with him. Every so often Mars tries to kill him, but Watney is resourceful and keeps his spirits up with humour.
This movie is lots of fun. I do prefer the book over the film, but only slightly. The biggest difference between the two is that in the book, we experience life on Mars through the logs that Watney records. In the movie, however, we see it through his eyes. Watney is a joker and an optimist, so when you read the book, these are the things that stand out most. However, in the movie we see Watney outside of his recordings, and he is (obviously) not as cool with his situation as he makes it seem in his logs. This makes the movie less lighthearted than the book, but on the whole, it is still quite funny.
What I really enjoy about movies based on books like the Martian, is that they visualise a bunch of things that I read in the book but couldn’t quite picture. There’s significantly less thinking to do when watching this movie, whereas when reading the book I constantly had to readjust my mental image of the Mars rover and the Hab, based on either new information, or information that wasn’t relevant before and I thus forgot to take into account.
The cast of this movie is great. Definitely a good movie to watch if you want to feel Hopeful™ about humanity coming together for a common goal. Something we could all use these days!
In one sentence: The Martian is worth watching, but I feel it loses a lot of what makes the book special.
The book – told almost exclusively through the protagonist Watney’s logs – is relentlessly optimistic, and very detailed on what Watney is doing. The book even brings you the (as I understand it, moderately accurate) minutiae of the chemistry and physics of the problems threatening Watney’s life, and his plans to deal with them.
Regardless of the accuracy of the science, this style of writing gives you insights into the challenges of space missions and the way astronauts need to think. This is a unique approach to a sci-fi novel and it has changed the way I view a genre I have been reading since before I was ten years old.
The movie… is just another Hollywood space movie. It looks good. It gets feelsy. It follows the expected patterns. There is no runtime to go into an appreciable amount of detail on any of the clever solutions Watney comes up with, nor would Hollywood expect their audience to understand or be engaged.
So instead of getting to think along with Watney and his clever solutions as we do in the book, we watch as a smart astronaut solves a number of half-way explained problems, and secures his survival with no more than a few hiccups along the way.
Perhaps partly because I already knew how the story was going to end, I didn’t feel the same tension I did reading the book. And at the same time that the movie presents Watney’s accomplishments as much more of a smooth ride, it also loses some of the upbeat humour of Watney’s logs in the book.
I am very much measuring the movie against the yardstick of the book, and that is probably because aside from its tone and the constraints of a movie runtime, Ridley Scott’s The Martian is actually a very faithful adaptation of the book.
If I could have rated the movie not as an adaptation but as an independent piece of media, without having read the book first, I might have rated it higher for making an honest attempt at showing us a plausible, powerful image of what a Mars-mission in the not too distant future could look like. From that perspective, The Martian actually strays pretty far from the path a Hollywood blockbuster is expected to take.
As a result, I feel that especially for people who have not read the book, The Martian is very much worth watching. It’s just… the book is a lot better!
Time to get to know the Escape Velocity Collection’s curators! How? By asking them the questions that really matter! Let’s see what our curators have to say…
This week’s question is:
What is the coolest bit of wolrdbuilding that you've encountered recently?
I was inspired to ask the curators this question because I was reading She Who Became the Sun by Shelley Parker Chan recently (review coming up somewhere in the near future!), and I was struck by just how much of an impact small bits of worldbuilding can have on how a book feels. I really really liked how in She Who Became the Sun, a book set in an alternate medieval China, the Mandate of Heaven was not just a cultural concept representing the favour of the gods and the right to rule, but a heavenly fire that individuals destined to rule could manifest physically. It is an awesome way to tie history and fantasy together, it made for some scenes that were great to imagine visually, and it even plays an important part in the book’s plot. Worldbuilding at its best!
I believe the coolest bit of worldbuilding I recently encountered was in Netflix’s The Sandman, with the credits probably belonging to Neil Gaiman. I thought that the way in which abstract concepts were personified – such as dreams, death and inspiration – resulted in some extremely cool stories and new ways to interpret our world and the themes we have to deal with daily. What if dreams were something we could literally force to come true? What if Death was locked up? And I’m not even speaking of the stunning visuals!
If I think of the latest pieces of media I consumed, most of them did not stand out because of their worldbuilding, but more because of their storytelling (or they did not stand out at all). There is one exception: The Great Chameleon War, a psychedelic story in a dreamscape of absurd imagery and ancient lizards that dominate the world like giant dinosaurs. This audio drama was (at first) pure discovery of the world, so actually pure worldbuilding.
I would have to say the Broken Earth Trilogy by N. K. Jemisin. A lot of fantasy media has similar worldbuilding, and I don’t think that’s a problem. After all, it can be really nice to step into a world and understand (most of) it immediately. However, this also means that when I encounter a fantasy world that doesn’t feel instantly familiar, it gives me a bit of a thrill. N. K. Jemisin gives us a universe that’s not eurocentric, has (for me at least) original ideas about magic, and left me fully confused as to where I was and what was going on. The beauty of her worldbuilding is that it absolutely makes sense; it just takes you a long time to really find your bearing. Once you do, it’s both indescribable and unforgettable.
That’s it: another soul-searching question answered!
Still curious? Visit each curator’s page to see what they’ve recently been up to!
Check out our reviews of the media discussed in this post here:
Hi all, and welcome to our update for October 2022!
At the end of the month, one of our curators looks back at what they’ve been up to over the past weeks and what we can (hopefully) expect from them in the not-too-distant future.
This month, Jop will reminisce on the past month and everything speculative that it entailed. What was this year’s birthday haul? How many books were read on vacation? And what reviews can soon be expected?
Read on!
Past month
October was a busy month for most of our curators, myself included. Jasmijn and I went on a most welcome vacation, leaving the stormy Dutch skies for the Mediterranean sun to read books at the beach. I took this chance to reread a fantasy classic: The Hobbit by J.R.R Tolkien. My inner optimist had also brought The Lord of the Rings to reread, but instead I started my first book in The Witcher series, The Last Wish, which was waiting at the hotel when we arrived. I’ll soon work on writing the reviews.
October was also the month of my 29th birthday. Of course, this meant a bunch of fantastical birthday gifts, such as several Pathfinder Bestiaries and a pendant to remind myself that “I am Fire, I am Death‘.
I also got Wonderbook, a extensive guide to writing fantasy and science fiction, with advice from great names like Neil Gaiman and George R.R. Martin. I’m excited to dive into this specialist literature.
But enough about me! My fellow curators offered some worthwhile recommendations, such as Netflix’s The Sandman. Furthermore, Key was either very generous or very lucky to discover two(!) five star audio dramas.
Personally, I’m very intrigued by Lotte’s mixed-positive review of The School for Good and Evil. It sounds as a perfect movie for a lazy evening.
Upcoming
Our curators are close to finishing Amazon’s The Rings of Power, and I’m curious to see if the finale will influence our general impression of this first season. Praise or hate? Future reviews will tell.
Meanwhile, I have some new animated shows to (hopefully) look forwards to. The fourth season of The Dragon Prince, launching in November on Netflix, and Dragon Age: Absolution, coming in December. A lot of dragons in my future, it seems. Just the way I like it!
By the way, I also received my physical copy of The River of Silver: Tales from the Daevabad Trilogy, and I can’t wait to return to this S.A. Chakraborty universe.
- Audio drama written & produced by Justin Hellstrom
- Released in 2020-2021
- Starring Justin Hellstrom, Romina, Emily Phipps, Aryn Rozelle and John Rosser
Welcome to the Nesting Zone, the home of huge and ancient chameleons that have presumably woken up after millennia of sleep. Soldiers and explorers roam this hostile and reality-bending world. Someone who calls himself The Amanuansis records his travels up the slope of Mt. Tahoma and tells the stories of the people he meets.
This audio drama is absolute madness – and I am all aboard with it. A soothing voice of poetic absurdities flows over the conscious layer of your mind, only occasionally touching those parts of your brain that connect to reality. Dolphins and flamingo’s drenched in motor oil stand hypnotised and aflame at a pond of sulphuric acid. Explorers crawl through vines of memories to stand eye-to-eye with albino lizards the size of dinosaurs. And you are thrown in a lake, where a carnivorous astronaut rises from the waves to eat all sanity that is left of you.
The only flaw of this piece of art is that you have to concentrate to make any sense of what is happening. Where I normally listen to audio drama’s while doing all kind of household chores, now I could only do specific things that didn’t need any braincells at all. The second season was easier to follow – you get used to the style and it has a bit more traditional story-structure with more dialogue and character actions.
Warning: listening may induce spontaneous limb regeneration, dreams of ancient reptiles baying at the sun, and the urge to run naked into the desert until you body becomes sand.
Tagged:
See also:
- Movie directed by Paul Feig
- Starring Sophia Anne Caruso, Sofia Wylie, Charlize Theron, and Kerry Washington
- Released October 2022
- Runtime: 147 minutes
Best buds Sophie and Aggy struggle to fit in in their provincial town, until they are suddenly whisked away to the mythical School for Good and Evil. Sophie, who dreams of being a princess, ends up at the school for Evil. Meanwhile, tomboy Aggy finds herself surrounded by vain princesses at the school for Good.
I’ve been quite looking forward to this movie, after seeing the trailer a couple of weeks ago. I was familiar with Sophia Anne Caruso from her work in the Broadway musical Beetlejuice. When she suddenly left, there was a lot of speculation about why. I found my answer to that question when I saw her in the trailer. Good for her!
Now I wasn’t particularly optimistic about The School for Good and Evil. It seems to have been based on a book, but I hadn’t heard of it. I am familiar with Disney’s Descendants movies, in which the kids of some Disney villains go to a school for princes and princesses. I really enjoyed those movies, but they are batshit insane. It’s a theme you really can’t play too straight, as there are too many questions that come up while watching. Why are the “good” kids not actually nice? How can a society of villains work, if all they do is treat each other badly? The answer, of course, is that there is no such thing as good and evil. However, having your movie end with that moral is like having your movie end with the revelation that the earth is round. Yeah. We know.
Because of all this, I wasn’t expecting to enjoy this movie very much, but I was pleasantly surprised. It’s not… good? But for me, it managed to find the right tone. It’s not extremely silly, but it also knows that it’s not some kind of cinematic masterpiece. The costumes are fun and the story is relatively simple. It’s a nice little romp through a fantasy land that you know is going to end well. None of the characters are particularly memorable, the writing is average and it’s very cliché in many ways. But who cares! Not every movie has to be a masterpiece to be enjoyable.
Now can anybody explain to me why anyone would want to date Teddy??
Tagged:
- Movie directed by Steven Spielberg
- Starring Sam Neill, Laura Fern, Jeff Goldblum, Richard Attenborough, Samuel L. Jackson, and others
- Released 1993
- Runtime: 127 minutes
John Hammond, a rich industrialist with more money than sense, decides to build an incredible theme park filled with actual live dinosaurs cloned from ancient DNA. The facilities are on a remote uninhabited island, isolated from the rest of the world. Hammond’s investors, fearing safety risks, send a team to assess the park’s security. When a tropical storm strikes the island during the very first tour, the security system is immediately subjected to a thorough stress-test…
Some pieces of media are so critically acclaimed that writing a review almost feels like sacrilege – how dare I, measly hobby-reviewer, have an opinion on one of the great works of Steven Spielberg?
Jurassic Park is a bit like that, so I’m treading lightly (unlike, say, a T-rex). The reason I am still reviewing Jurassic Park is that I found out Jasmijn hadn’t actually ever watched it – which was somewhat shocking, because as a full-fledged-never-quite-grown-out-of-it-dinosaur kid it is almost impossible to imagine that there are people who do not have the memory of that T-rex encounter or the velociraptor kitchen scene engraved in their childhood brain. So basically, I am here to tell you that if you haven’t watched Jurassic Park, what are you doing with your life and clear your schedule tonight. Which, incidentally, is exactly what Jasmijn and I did.
So, Jurassic Park is a movie about dinosaurs that is older than I am. Maybe you’re expecting me to say that the special effects don’t hold up, but that you should watch it for it’s place in cinema history. You’d be wrong. Sure, you can tell in some scenes that the CGI wasn’t exactly made yesterday. But since most of the close up work is done with animatronics or people in honest to god dinosaur suits – and since a lot of the CGI is during somewhat blurry night shots – it is hardly noticeable that the movie is nearing it’s 30th birthday. Some of the pacing is a bit different from what we’d expect today, but once disaster starts to strike, I guarantee you’ll be on the edge of your seat. I’m not exactly a fashion enthousiast, but it even feels like a lot of the clothing in the movies is actually getting back in vogue these days.
Jurassic Park does not have a particularly sophisticated message or subversive twist. It lays it on thick sometimes. It might not surprise you. It neatly fits the classic movie model. But it is just incredibly well made, with lovely little touches like always showing the humans’ reaction to the dinosaurs before aiming the camera at the prehistoric beasts that are the real stars of the show. And of course, the premise is the absolute best. I think Jurassic Park is a movie for everyone, as I am sure Jasmijn’s review will confirm.
I’m subtracting half a star because being controversial is fun (if I was just going to give this a five star rating, you might not be reading this review!), and also for the liberties Spielberg and his team took in their depictions of dinosaurs (both the ones they should’ve known about and speculation that was subsequently disproven by later paleontological research). You know I’m a stickler for historical (and apparently, prehistorical) accuracy: velociraptors are way smaller than that, and also have feathers. I once outran a T-rex on a bike (though it was hard work) in my local museum T-rex experience (set up when they acquired their T-rex skeleton), so a Jeep shouldn’t have any trouble. No way a brachiosaurus is going to stand up on its hind legs. Etc. But don’t let my pedantry get in the way of having fun – they mixed in frog DNA, so for all we know a cloned dilophosaurus might actually spit poison…
I’ll be honest, I haven’t read Crichton’s book yet (please forgive my hypocrisy, I originally watched it before I decided on my rule to always read the book first), but now that I’ve re-watched the movie, that’s itching a bit. Sigh. Another one to put on the list.
This was my fist experience with the Jurassic World-franchise and I must say that I was amused. The story goes where you expect it to go and if the movie was filmed today I would hope that the cast would be more diverse – it is a product of it’s time. However, none of these issues break the movie. The characters rely a bit on stereotypes bus they have their twists and turns along the way. Overall, I was having a good time.
I watched this movie with Peter because dinosaurs are awesome and in that area the movie did not disappoint. For a movie that was made in the nineties, the way they decided to bring those dinosaurs to life on screen still holds up quite well.
Why had I never tried to watch this myself? I was a little afraid that the story and visuals would be gruesome (rampaging dinosaurs, lots of blood everywhere), but I was pleasantly surprised. This is a movie that can be catered to a younger audience as well, the bits that could be seen as ‘gruesome’ still have a slapstick-y element.
Next stop: the natural history museum, because I need to see the dinosaurs!
Tagged:
See also:
No posts found!
Review: The Martian – Ridley Scott
NASA Astronaut Mark Watney was only supposed to be on Mars for 31 days. When a Dust storm almost kills him, the rest of the crew leaves – under the impression that their colleague is actually dead. In his logs, Watney keeps track of his days (or “sols” – Mars days) on the Red planet, and his efforts to survive on the supplies and equipment left behind with him. Every so often Mars tries to kill him, but Watney is resourceful and keeps his spirits up with humour.
Curator Question: What is the coolest bit of worldbuilding you’ve encountered recently?
Our curators share some awesome tidbits of worldbuilding from their recent ventures in the speculative genre!
Review: The Great Chameleon War – Justin Hellstrom
Welcome to the Nesting Zone, where someone who calls himself The Amanuansis poetically records his travels through a surreal dreamscape full of huge ancient lizars.
Review: The School for Good and Evil – Netflix
Best buds Sophie and Aggy struggle to fit in in their provincial town, until they are suddenly whisked away to the mythical School for Good and Evil.
Review: Jurassic Park – Steven Spielberg
Some rich guy with more money than sense decides to build an incredible theme park filled with actual live dinosaurs cloned from ancient DNA on an isolated island. His investors, fearing safety risks, send a team to assess the park’s security. When a tropical storm strikes the island during the very first tour, the security system is immediately subjected to a thorough stress-test…