Welcome to the Escape Velocity Collection!
We are an opinionated group of friends reviewing all sorts of fantasy and science fiction media. Don’t forget to get to know the curators and visit our curated Collection, where we discuss the stories that never cease to transport us to another world.
Will you escape with us?
LATEST POSTS:
- Book written by Naomi Novik
- Published 10 July 2018
- Standalone
Miryem’s father is a moneylender. He is renowned for his kindness, and eventually the family falls into poverty as the townspeople take advantage of his leniency and stop paying back their loans. Eventually, Miryem hardens her heart and starts collecting the debts herself. She becomes known as someone who can spin silver into gold, and attracts the attention of the king of the Staryk, a mythical icy people who terrorise humans. Meanwhile a plain noblewoman tricks the cold-hearted tsar into marrying her, and discovers exactly what evil force has chilled his heart.

Spinning Silver is a stunning fairy tale. Novik manages to capture a certain atmosphere incredibly well. Honestly, it’s hard to describe quite how this book made me feel.
It’s definitely not a short book, but it was well worth the time I spent on it. The ~vibe~ of this book is fantastic. I’d highly recommend reading this in winter, especially if you live in a place where it snows.
One of my favourite things about Spinning Silver were the characters. Everyone seems to have depth, and you really grow to like some of them, even if you strongly disliked them at the start. Novik takes her time with these character developments, and the story never feels rushed.
This book is a retelling of the fairy tale of Rumpelstiltskin. I feel like the genre of fairy tale retellings is a very difficult one to work in, as it’s very easy to come up with “twists” to fairy tales, which means that it’s hard to come up with something original that feels like it stands alone and isn’t just something at the level of Disney’s live action remakes. I honestly really dislike a lot of this genre because I’m not a huge fan of stories that are made “edgy” for the sake of it. Spinning Silver doesn’t fall in this trap. To be honest, I’m not sure I would have recognised it as being inspired by Rumpelstiltskin (because I am dense, but also because it’s not a one to one retelling). The story has its dark moments, but they serve a purpose in the book.
Spinning Silver is what a book should be. You know how sometimes you read a book, and in that book a character is reading a book about far off places and magic and magical creatures? And then you wish you could find a book just like that because it sounds so whimsical and dream-like? Yeah. That’s kind of what Spinning Silver is like.

It’s rare to find books in which characters and plot are skilfully balanced, even more so when the story is told from multiple perspectives. It’s quite extraordinary to find such qualities in a book that also comes with a strong atmosphere and well-developed themes. Imagine my pure delight when I discovered Naomi had craftily managed this with Spinning Silver!
Truly, there’s little to criticize in this book. It has a well built cast of characters whose storylines are cleverly interwoven. Although I can’t say the characters deeply touched me on an emotional level, their struggles and sentiments were very convincing. Furthermore, the female protagonists get to be strong in an authentic way, without the author succumbing to cheap tomboy pitfalls. Especially Miryem hit the mark for me, and I was impressed with the subtle and sensitive way Naomi handled her Jewish heritage.
Another one of Spinning Silver‘s strong points is its mystical atmosphere, strongly defined by elements of (East-)European fairy tales and cultures. The story quickly invoked a sense of wonder in me, not very unsimilar to the way a younger me felt when listening to fairy tales in my youth. If that’s not magical, what is?

I enjoyed Spinning Silver. I am not lyrical about it, but I know some other curators are and I can totally see why. Spinning Silver is awesome at what it tries to do. What it tries to do is just not what I want to read most of the time.
Spinning Silver is a fairytale-esque fantasy novel set in a wintery eastern European medieval setting that is just new enough to entice and just familiar enough to be comfortable. It follows the day to day struggles of three women, each trying to achieve their own goal. Each of our protagonists then gets set on a path towards a confrontation with the magical powers that keep the land shrouded in an unnaturally long winter.
The fairy tale-esque nature of the book means that the worldbuilding is relatively limited and it instead leans heavily on mystery and atmosphere. This, alongside its themes of building confidence, standing up for yourself, and the importance of family, makes it a light read particularly well suited for younger readers.
There is also a subtle red line of antisemitism and the othering of Jews in medieval communities, though it does not have hard edges in this specific book and might actually serve well as a starting point for a conversation about discrimination in modern society.
Personally, I was not blown away. I am not a massive fan of Novik’s writing style in Spinning Silver and Uprooted, which I think is a bit matter-of-fact and – dare I say it? – a bit dull (often, she writes relatively large sections which feel like a chronological observation of a character’s actions more than the telling of a story). I always whish Novik would tell us just a little bit more about the worlds and cities her characters inhabit, which are an original take on the genre and just screaming for more detail. And I wish she would giver her characters just a bit more flavour and individuality. In this book, I felt like two of the three main characters were so similar as to be nearly indistinguishable at times.
That’s a lot of criticism (especially for a book that I enjoyed!), and I understand the criticism is mostly besides the point of the book.
Spinning Silver is about the atmosphere, about coming together to defeat not one but two evils, about spring beating winter, about mystical cabins in the wood and hidden worlds behind a mirror. If that description stirs something inside you, I wholeheartedly recommend you Spinning Silver.
If you, like me, are into fantasy with rough edges, however, this book might not be your favourite read of the year.
Tagged:
- Book written by William Gibson
- Published 1 July 1984
- Part 1 in the Sprawl Trilogy
William Gibson’s debut novel Neuromancer is the work that defined and almost single-handedly established the Cyberpunk genre. It is the story of Henry Case, a washed up hacker that is wasting his life away as a drug addict in the underworld of Japanese Chiba, until he gets picked up by Molly, a mercenary in the service of one Armitage, an ex-special forces agent, who needs Case’s hacking skills for a job unlike any Case ever tried before.

There is one thing you need to know before you start reading this book, and that is that when it was written in 1984, the internet did not (really) exist (its development is complicated, but it was not publicly accessible). Gibson wrote Neuromancer on a typewriter and bought his first computer with the royalties. It is absolutely amazing, therefore, that Gibson predicted a world with a globally linked computer system, advanced artificial intelligence, portable computers, and a virtual reality internet interface that visualised data as buildings and interactable programs as people. In his novel (and the short stories that he wrote in the years before), he coined the terms cyberspace and ‘the matrix’ (as applied to the visual representation of a computer programme). That alone should make you want to pick up this book.
But Gibson did not just have ideas that were way ahead of his time. The novel also has a great balance between building the world, action sequences, and character moments delving into the backgrounds and relationships of the characters. The strongest element, however, is that it oozes atmosphere, from the corpocratic world of Chiba city in the shadows of Tokyo, where drug dealers and hardware fences mix with Yakuza operatives and the occasional corporate clerk looking for something illegal, to the bazaar of Istanbul, where spices are sold over the same counter as software of dubious legality, next to the stuffed skin of a now-extinct horse, to the extravagant satellite Freeside, a Las Vegas in the sky that is home of casinos, brothels, and the villa’s of the super-rich.
Gibson’s prose is evocative, and I find that he has the talent to say a lot in a few lines. Like many top-tier writers of science-fiction, he hints at the past of his world with a few throwaway lines, leaving the reader’s imagination to fill in the gaps. In other places, he takes time to describe the gritty world that his characters inhabit, which came to define the cyberpunk genre. You could argue that Gibson has been more influential for cyberpunk than Tolkien has been for fantasy.
As we’ve now come to expect of a cyberpunk novel, Neuromancer is a book that takes a very negative view of humanity. The characters are eternally in conflict with each other, and each is looking for meaning in a world that seems to offer very little. However, where characters caught in dark thought spirals can feel artificial and unnecessarily edgy at times, I found that Gibson managed to write his characters’ brooding in a way that engaged me emotionally. It also helped, of course, that the world the characters had to live in was such a dark place. And while the novel overall is pretty bleak, there are enough light moments to make it all bearable.
All in all, I think that Neuromancer is rightfully one of the classics of the genre. I really enjoyed reading it, and I keep catching myself thinking back to it. Unless you have a particularly strong dislike for stories with a dark tone, I think that really anyone who hasn’t tried it yet should give this book a shot – after all, it was so wonderfully imaginative that it defined a genre of its own.
See also:
Tagged:
Time to get to know the curators from the Escape Velocity Collection! How? By asking them the questions that really matter! Let’s see what our curators have to say…
This week’s question is:
The new Rings of Power teaser trailer, yay or nay?
Ehm… ‘may’?
I’ll confess, I’m not really excited at the moment. “Why not? You love Lord of the Rings! You should be thrilled there’s more content coming!” Well, that’s a very good point. However, the trailer did not yet invoke the Middle-Earth spirit within me. Sure, it was flashy and mysterious, but it was not really substantial. “Before the king. Before the fellowship. Before the ring.” I already knew all this. I’ve learned nothing new, except for a few faces (Elrond with short hair, why?) and places.
It should be said, however, I’m ultimately still not pessimistic towards the series. People are hating on the diverse casting and the lack of Tolkien-purity or whatever. I don’t mind that (and even applaud it). I’m still curious. I just feel this trailer was not very… telling. It could have been a new Narnia trailer just as well. Hopefully, future trailers will be more substantial.
I desperately want to yay this – I’m living and breathing Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings-trilogy every day and I want this to be equally good. So far though… the more I learn about it, the worse it seems to get. Perhaps that’s just because nothing could possibly live up to how great the LotR-trilogy was, and maybe I’ve made that better in my mind than it really ever was.
But ‘Haven’t you ever wondered what else is out there’ is just… such a non-Tolkienesque line. That line seems very much aimed at the audience. Like… Middle-Earth is all about myths and legends and ancient grudges. People in Middle-Earth know what is out there, they know the stories, they revere the past. Tolkien is not about that mystical sense of enchantment of what might lie beyond the next hill, that’s Narnia!
And I think that describes this trailer for me: if I hadn’t know better, I would’ve probably guessed it was for a Narnia series. Even the visual style, I think, is reminiscent of those movies. Basically – it looks and feels like a cleaned up, overly groomed, fairy tale-esque, children’s version of The Lord of the Rings. That’s harsh, maybe. I hope to god I’m wrong.
First thought: I guess?? In the trailer I recognised pretty much nothing at all (except for the big pointy statue guy), so I’m not sure how this is supposed to reel in the fans. However, I’m not one to rain on a parade that hasn’t even started yet, so I’ll give it a fair chance. Considering the amount of money they threw at this, it might actually turn out not too bad. I just really want it to be good, for my friends. But looking at their reactions, I might be a little bit too optimistic. I’ll have to watch it anyway so we’ll see, haha.
Nay. I did not read or see anything before this trailer, but this gives me more reason to doubt than to be hyped. I saw some great landscapes and impressive settings, but also some too-polished CGI that reminded me of the Hobbit trilogy – and that’s not good. But most stuck with me the amount of teenagers in the trailer, all looking like they were about to have angsty romances. Brr, I hope I’m wrong…
That’s it: another soul-searching question answered!
Still curious? Visit each curator’s page to see what they’ve recently been up to!
Check out our reviews of the media recommended in this post here::
- Movie directed by James Cameron
- Starring Sigourney Weaver, MIchael Biehn, Carrie Henn
- Released 1986
- Runtime: 137 minutes
After the events of Alien Ripley drift through space until she is picked up decennia later. The company she worked for does not believe her story of why she voluntarily blew up their expensive spaceship, because the planet she escaped is in the process of being terraformed by a small colony. But then contact with the colony is lost. Ripley is persuaded to join a military rescue mission as an advisor. They will blow those alien-types to pieces! But the aliens (xenomorphs) also bring back-up…
I started watching Aliens with a mixture of hope to be very entertained and readiness to be disappointed. After the pleasant surprise of the first movie in this franchise holding up to my nostalgia, I did not dare to expect a similar great experience with this movie that I had no real memory of. But I was wrong to doubt the movie! Moreover, I enjoyed this movie even more than the first one.
I will not be the first to say that James Cameron did an excellent job in elaborating on the world of Alien, keeping its horror intact while shifting the genre slightly from horror to war movie. I felt for most space marines, who felt iconic even when I would not have known them from popular media, for the young girl Newt and of course for Ripley.
And the sound design of this thing! The heartbeat-score of the first movie was replaced by a proximity meter-score and the whole was a lot more, ehm, more. But my favourite moment was the moment the elaborate introduction of the marines and their military mission transitioned into the horror of the xenomorphs. The sudden shift from triumphant military marching music to almost complete quiet, with only an occasional low note, was an amazing way to build tension.
I loved it and it was great to see this movie also stands the test of time.
Tagged:
Time to get to know the curators from the Escape Velocity Collection! How? By asking them the questions that really matter! Let’s see what our curators have to say…
This week’s question is:
Do you prefer Fantasy or Sci-Fi?
I choose you, sci-fi! Although I do not see myself as someone particulary fascinated by space or technology, I love the societal stories good sci-fi tells. In my opinion, the best sci-fi warns us for the excesses of technology or show another way of living together, new societal hierarchies for better and for worse. I guess I want my media to make me think.
Fantasy on the other hand, I associate more with escapism. And while I want to walk a mile in someone else’s moccasins, I ultimately want to come out a better, more mindful person myself. Then again, I do love playing D&D, watching LotR and recently read the first trilogy of Robin Hobb with great enthusiasm. So, maybe, there is still hope for me…
I can appreciate both. The most important thing for me is that the world isn’t needlessly complicated (Dune, I’m talking about you), and the plot is about the characters more than about stinky politics (stupid Dune). I love magical elements, so if I had to choose I would gravitate towards fantasy. Fairytales are the stories I most easily get lost in, in a good way. But I do enjoy the tech-elements that come with a sci-fi story (long way to a small angry planet).
I love both! It’s really tough to pick one or the other. I think they scratch different itches and I wouldn’t want to give up either. That’s not what you’re here for though.
If I look back over the past years, I have read more fantasy than sci-fi. I think Fantasy books have a tendency to be more comfortable, easier to read, more exciting, a bit less thought-provoking. I like reading science fiction because as a genre it is constructed to encourage you to reflect on the present. It’s more inherently political. But that also means that reading and properly considering a sci-fi book takes a bit more out of you. Because I am so busy with my job, I tend to want to relax a bit more in my free time – and so I often feel more inclined towards fantasy.
The above dichotomy is less evident outside of books and maybe tv shows, so in games or films I really don’t have a preference.
I love sci-fi, but my heart will always belong to fantasy.
For me it’s mostly an aesthetic thing. I love historical fashion, hairstyles and design. I love the idea of nature, even if I rarely go out in it because it’s kinda dirty and bugs scare me. I’m not much of a minimalist, so the fact that most science fiction styles tend to be quite minimal kind of puts me off.
Still, I do love science fiction as a genre. I love space, and I love the idea that science fiction shows us what our society could look like in the future. I just don’t love the type of future we are often shown.
I am – and probably always will be – a true stan for fantasy.
The imagination and (possible) diversity of the fantasy genre speaks to me in a way that I cannot quite put into words. Where most people tend to write it off as a non-intellectual genre, I find that it invites me to look at things in unique and different ways. At the same time, the escapist elements of fantasy remain comfortable enough for me that I don’t mind pondering more difficult issues. Also, I like dragons and forests.
As for sci-fi, as some Dutch twitch-streamers wisely summarized: I’m not much of a spacem’n. Space, aliens, and smooth metal spaceships and such are not necessarily my thing. This leaves me with sci-fi that stays more true to our current world barring a few differences, and although the scenarios and questions in these stories often intrigue me, the similarity with our own life prevents me from truly enjoying them in a escapist way.
In general, I would rather read a story that takes place in a forest than a story that is set on a spaceship. Even though a large part of fantasy and sci-fi stories might not take place in either of those two settings, I still find it helpful to explain why I am often drawn more to fantasy than to sci-fi: I really enjoy the mystical atmosphere and the focus on natural elements that many fantasy worlds offer. While I appreciate sci-fi stories for their originality and thought-provoking questions, their settings are usually less comfortable and therefore less effective as a means of escapism, to me at least.
That’s it: another soul-searching question answered!
Still curious? Visit each curator’s page to see what they’ve recently been up to!
Check out our reviews of the media recommended in this post here::
- Book written by Ted Chiang
- Published 7 May 2019
- Short story collection
A merchant in ancient Baghdad discovers a time portal which allows him to revisit his past mistakes. A former zookeeper takes a job raising digital lifeforms. A new technology enables people to communicate with alternate versions of themselves, and to see how their life would have turned out if they had made different choices. The nine short stories in this collection focus on some of life’s biggest questions: questions about free will, the nature of consciousness and humanity’s place in the universe.

Exhalation is a collection of novellas and short stories. I’m rating and reviewing the book as whole, but I’ll include a couple of lines on the separate stories below.
Exhalation is one of these books I’ve been vaguely aware of for years, but I didn’t get round to for a long time for no other reason than that there was always something else just above it on the list. It’s a real pity, because Exhalation is an amazing collection of short stories with not a single miss in it.
Chiang writes very traditional science fiction in the sense that all of his stories are based on an idea. Whether the idea is a scientific discovery, a technology or magic, Chiang then explores the impact of that idea on society. That doesn’t mean his characters are poorly written, but the stories are not designed around the characters like most fiction is.
Most of the stories in Exhalation focus on pretty heavy topics such as fate, free will or the literal meaning of life. Chiang manages to elegantly weave these questions into everyday narratives that keep the big topics relatable. I think it is a sign of his mastery that Chiang is able to write so thought-provokingly without ever needing to change much about our society to make it work.
Both bite-size and literary, the stories in Exhalation have been showered with awards and nominations, and I think they deserve it. Below, I’ve included a separate rating for each of the stories in the collection.
—-
The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate: 5/5. Hugo- and Nebula Award winning novelette (apparently, a ‘novellette’ is a thing). Amazing 1001-nights inspired fantasy story on fatalism, time travel and the nature of loss.
Exhalation: 3.5/5. Hugo Award winning short story on entropy and the ultimate finality of life in the universe. very fatalist, strangely soothing.
What’s Expected of Us: 4/5. Cute bite-size short story on the nature of free will.
The Lifecycle of Software Objects: 5/5. Hugo- and Locus Award winning novella on the nature of our relationship with AI. The interesting twist is that the AI is not indistinguishable from humans, but rather very clearly just a little below that threshold. That makes the questions on AI rights and the place AI takes in the main characters’ lives feel more real somehow.
Dacey’s Patent Automatic Nanny: 3.5/5. Novelette on a steampunk nanny-robot that reminded me a lot of the type of technology described in The Difference Engine.
The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feeling: 4/5. A short story on the benefits and dangers of recording memories. A very similar idea to the (earlier) Black Mirror episode S1E3 “The Entire History of You”, though somewhat less dramatic in presentation. It is interspersed with a story on the impact of writing brought to Nigeria by European missionaries.
The Great Silence: 3/5. A short story intended to be part of an art installation – still works in the book, but I would rank it last (which is no shame in this list).
Omphalos: 4.5/5. Fascinating, Locus Award-winning story based on the premise that the world was indeed created by a god in the (relatively) recent past, and it is possible to find scientific evidence of that creation. It explores the idea of meaning in a world where a god might exist, but you might not be sure he is watching.
Anxiety is the Dizziness of Freedom: 5/5. I’m not sure on the name of this novella, but don’t let that put you off. It explores the idea of free will and choices if the existence of parallel universes is confirmed and you can have a peek in them every now and them. It reminded me of The Peripheral (the novel) at times.

I finally got round to reading this collection, which has been sitting patiently on my shelf since I bought it in October. I generally enjoyed it: the stories were interesting and definitely thought-provoking in the best sense. I especially enjoyed the story ‘Exhalation’, which offers a strange but unique meditation on the scientific concept of entropy.
Many of the stories in the collection offer a Black Mirror-like view on the impact that new technologies could have on the human experience, although I do have to add that Chiang’s stories are far less dark than those of Black Mirror. Whether that is a good or a bad thing you will have to decide for yourself. Personally, I especially appreciated how well Chiang was able to translate the impact of these technologies to the lived experiences of his characters. He adds many nuanced but realistic details about the unexpected ways in which people’s daily life could be affected.
As is usually the case with short story collections, not every story worked equally well for me. But on the whole I think it is a very strong book with a number of truly interesting takes on some of the mysteries of our existence.
Tagged:

Review: Spinning Silver – Naomi Novik
In a modern take on a classic fairy tale, we follow three young women as they face a cold, bitter winter, and everything that can be found within it.

Review: Neuromancer – William Gibson
Part one of the Sprawl Trilogy – Henry Case, a hacker wasting his life away in the underworld of Japanese Chiba, gets picked up by a mercenary in the service of an ex-special forces agent who needs his hacking skills for a unique job.
Curator Question: The new Rings of Power teaser trailer, yay or nay?
Our curators discuss the new Rings of Power teaser trailer: yay or nay?

Review: Aliens – James Cameron
Decades after the events of Alien, Ripley returns to the planet with a military rescue mission. But she is not the only one with back-up…
Curator Question: Do you prefer Fantasy or Sci-Fi?
Our curators discuss which genre they like best: fantasy or science fiction?

Review: Exhalation – Ted Chiang
A merchant in ancient Baghdad discovers a time portal which allows him to revisit his past mistakes. A former zookeeper takes a job raising digital lifeforms. A new technology enables people to communicate with alternate versions of themselves, and to see how their life would have turned out if they had made different choices.



















